ADM Network | A Curvy Diva | Long Distance Diva | Marriage Diva | Parenting Diva | Telecommuting Diva| Advertise|
>>Go Back Home

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.

Other Posts
The Bridezilla Quiz: Are You One?
How to be a “Good Wife” a.k.a. Doormat

Is it Rude to Only Invite to the Wedding?

Posted by Diva on August 14th, 2007

Q: We are on a budget. We can’t feed everyone. Is it ok to invite some people to the wedding only and not the reception?

A: No, it’s not ok and I don’t see why you’d want to unless you are fishing for gifts. “Come to my wedding, watch me walk down the aisle, bring me a gift and leave it on the table on your way out.”

Have the wedding & reception you can afford. If that means you can’t invite everyone and their momma’s momma then so be it. Cut down your guest list, but don’t cut it in such a way that you are excluding people from one part of the festivities. If that doesn’t work, I am sure there are other areas you can cut back on.



Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

If the only reason you are inviting them is for the gifts, then yes - it’s wrong. But - by rules of etiquette, a wedding invitation should never come with the expectation of a gift anyway. Inviting or not inviting someone should have absolutely nothing to do with wanting gifts (though, there are many brides who are that shallow unfortunately)

It is not uncommon to have a ceremony only invitation and only immediately family for a much smaller reception. Generally, there receptions are just small dinners - not a full dance/bar affair and are kept very low key.

If your concern is that people will feel they need to buy gifts, include a note on the invitation saying “Your presence is our gift” - then, if they still choose to bless you with a gift anyway, then let them.

Another option is to plan a afternoon or evening wedding ceremony(not over a meal time) with a cake/champagne reception for all your guests. Then, host a private dinner party following for your immediate family only. This allows you to celebrate with everyone affordably and still have the intimate affordable dinner reception as well.

I respect your P.O.V. but I’d have to disagree. Inviting someone to the reception and not the wedding is fine because a lot of people want close family only or they have a destination wedding but have a reception later. But the other way around just doesn’t fly with me and this is honestly the first time I’ve read that it’s ok. BTW, I am not viewing a small family dinner as the same thing as a full on reception.

I tend to agree with Crystal only on the 2d option - a wedding ceremony, a cake/champagne reception for all guests and a meal for family only.
Actually that’s how most weddings are done in France. (except for the big budget ones)

However having NO reception that ALL guests are invited to does seem pretty tacky.

Don’t invite me to your wedding if I am not invited to the reception. I’d rather not be invited at all. Reception to me= dinner, dancing, music, etc. not a cake toasting party. So yes it’s rude to have a reception and not invite people who were invited to the wedding.



womens blog network


Privacy Policy
Close
E-mail It